This is important, and sacred. The best understanding that can be had from this web-medium is not a brief definition here but a study and meditation on, particularly, those articles appended with this tag.
Five days ago I witnessed a powerful augury which may lend itself to some of your meditations. A hawk was gliding overhead, steady, silent, strong. Then at one point a common grackle took offense and began to pester the hawk mercilessly. Maybe it strayed too near a nest or a mate, or perhaps the mere presence of an apex-species upset the lesser bird’s sense of precious ‘safety’. Whatever the cause, the grackle flew around and bombarded the hawk with a barrage of dives and cackles, and the raptor was clearly about to be forced to notice the offending vermin.
My first night in Sarajevo was last night. The first thing to strike me was the mountains. Looking through the window of my airplane, I mistook them for storm clouds, as they had completely covered the sky visible in the window. Stepping off the plane, and seeing what they were in fact, the energy of the country began to hit me.
Yes, we of the Right often desire and create for children and students the harsh tests of adversity – ‘the cruel tests of needless suffering,’ those unfit to win life on Nature’s terms (thus, their lifestyles’ appalling assault and toll upon the Nature whose uncheated judgment would condemn them to the compost heap of failure well-salvaged) or else (((scheming))) to divorce our People from the healthy foundation of Natural Law would say. But are our ‘harsh tests of adversity’ “suffering”? The Power (and, thus, the Responsibility!) of that living-through lies with each man and woman on our Quest, for which reason we’ll no more than mention that personal questioning here tonight. More importantly to yesterday’s and to tomorrow’s posts, though – are our ‘harsh tests of adversity’ “needless”?
Originally posted to Right Wing Philosophy on April 12, 2017.
It is a well known phenomenon in right wing circles that the men are tough, chiseled, and embodying masculine virtues. We work hard, we are decisive, we speak Truth and are upright, and we hold ourselves and others to exacting standards. This is opposed to, on the Left, the effeminate “man” who can never seem to offer a firm handshake, make a decision, work with proper effort, and most irritating of all, end every sentence with an upward inflection. Standards applied, and the laws of Opposite Attraction in place, the Perfect Man inevitably attracts the Perfect Woman.
Originally posted to Right Wing Philosophy on April 1, 2017.
Recently we’ve been asked for a more explicit explanation of what we mean when we advocate (re-)founding a Civilization upon an understanding of Natural Law. We’ve also been queried regarding Darwin, evolution as “progress”, and all the rest, and the two subjects suit one another altogether too fittingly to pass up a chance for examining both tonight. For ease of exposition, we’ll begin following the second end of this labyrinthine thread first.
Originally posted to Right Wing Philosophy on March 30, 2017.
Falling into the phase of (((Enemy))) strategy in which our People are deprived of both Leadership and Direction healthy and germane to them, the tendency of the Left to buy votes of confidence (or, at least, of avarice) from those gratified by all the appearances and none of the realities of self-determination tends to present a rather glaring disparity between the utopia promised and the waste land delivered.
The past three days in particular have seen us paying particular attention to the three major components of a worthy Civilization – indeed, of a healthy People. First, we sought to describe the ultimate basis of our Tradition: Right Knowledge, that distinctly Aryan foundation derived from the union of Natural Law and Spiritual Truth that we have in mind when we speak of such philosopher-kingly traits as Wisdom and Understanding.
Last night we spoke on the importance of Right Knowledge: on the harmony of Natural Law and Spiritual Truth in the Ordering of a renewed Civilization. This concept is so important to us that in expressions of Aryan Tradition as geographically far-flung as the Dharmic Varnas and Plato’s Academe, the Brahmins and the Philosopher-Kings respectively were placed in the topmost caste in the Hierarchy so that, with a stable foundation in Truth, the ontological scaffolding of the Civilization might support as high a climb for the People as possible.
We’ve been getting some really fantastic private messages and visitor posts lately that only further bolster our resolve and commitment to what we are doing here: because this page demonstrably attracts readers from all over the world of real intelligence coupled with an inherently practical emphasis, and these are the people who get things done. One recent visitor post touches on something so essential that we find it necessary to split our response into three main prongs of attack – for those of you not following every little detail, this little series of posts has been instigated by the following:
“So what do we do? What are our options, and what does our future look like, from your perspective? What is the ideal game plan for success?
“Is it simply education? War? Both?
“I think that if the masses knew about the truth behind the holocaust, it would create a much needed domino effect of lies being unraveled. If the lies surrounding the holocaust collapse, so do many others. It’s a support beam running straight through the foundation of so many important matters.
“But then again, I sometimes unfortunately think only bloodshed will reverse the damage. What do you think?”